Empress Theodora

Empress TheodoraTheodora was (most likely) born In 497 CE, a few years short of the dawn of the sixth century. She was the middle child of three, all girls, and more or less destined for disrepute. Her father was a bear trainer in the Hippodrome of Constantinople, capital of what we today tend to think of as the Byzantine Empire. If you’d asked anyone living there at the time, however, they’d have been far more likely to think of themselves as Rome.

While later historians would mark 476 CE as “the fall of the Roman Empire,” no one told Rome. Granted, they were plagued with endless foreign invasions (the Goths, the Vandals, and other punk-band sounding names) and struggling financially, but they didn’t exactly disappear – they just… adjusted a bit. The traditional capital in Italy was lost, but the seat of power had already largely shifted further east to what today is Istanbul. In reality, “Rome” continued until 1453 when the Ottomans overthrew their capital and changed the name.

Why did Constantinople get the works? That’s nobody’s business but the Turks.

The Bare Necessities

When you picture Roman chariot races, massive battle reenactments, and all the weird stuff they used to do to animals for entertainment, you probably include a standard “Roman coliseum” in the mix. One of the grandest was Constantinople’s Hippodrome. It’s not certain exactly what was covered by the title “bear keeper” (presumably it at least involved caring for the bears used as entertainment in various ways), but it definitely made Theodora and her sisters part of the “theater” class. Professional entertainment has always been a suspect class; it’s only in the past century we’ve begun celebrating entertainers as worthy of emulation or even idolization. For the previous thousand or so years, theater types were considered sketchy at best – right down there with Gypsies, Jews, and Tucker Carlson.

The details are a bit fuzzy, but the lines between “actress” and “prostitute” were pretty thin in the sixth century. It’s probably not that surprising that folks entertained by animals slaughtering one another or eating criminals or whatever weren’t overly highbrow when it came to their human entertainment. Much like today, fart jokes, violence, and sex were far stronger draws than philosophical discussions. Theodora was apparently quite ribald even at an age we’d consider WAY too young today, and for whatever reason she was VERY good at it.

She developed quite a reputation among fans of the “theater.” We can judge her for that if we like, but keep in mind that in most times and places throughout history, women have had very little political or economic power. They’ve been systematically marginalized and legally restrained. {Editor’s Note: if you live in a red state, please change this line to “some women have possibly at times been randomly subjected to unrelated episodes of sexism by individuals who coincidentally passed laws to reinforce their personal, non-systemic biases.”}

There was no option for Theodora to “study hard” or “make good choices” and get anywhere beyond tawdry routines and maybe some animal training. So, like many women who ended up in the history books, she used what she had – a gift for tantalizing men (and possibly a number of women as well) and a sharp mind – to raise her station. If she managed to break a few, um… “hearts” along the way, then so be it.

Working Her Way Up (And Down)

As sometimes happens when enough seed is sown, Theodora found herself with child and delivered a baby boy while still in her prime. The father was apparently happy to have a son, but less enthusiastic to be associated with the mother, so he took the boy back with him to whatever part of the world he called home. Not long after, Theodora had a chance to climb the social ladder a bit via an up-and-comer (as it were) named Hecebolus who was assuming the throne in Northern Africa. She lived in relative luxury for a time, but it seems the couple soon had a falling out and she was left with few resources and no way home.

It’s not certain what went wrong, but several plausible accounts suggest that while Theodora was confident and quick-witted, she lacked tact (or fear) when dealing with powerful men. This boldness was no doubt one of her most appealing qualities, but we’ve all read enough books and seen enough movies to know how things turn out for the saucy hottie once her target grows secure in his position and tires of her constant input and opinions. It’s likely Theodora shared one “insight” or criticism too many – a costly error she would never make again.

While it’s possible to trace her winding path back to Constantinople, the real story is the humiliation and degradation she suffered attempting to earn her sustenance and continue her travels. She’d been born into humble circumstances, but until now had always been able to seduce, charm, or think her way out of almost any crisis. It’s not that her beauty had faded – by all accounts she was still a stunner. She was simply in unfamiliar territory plying a far-too-common trade. It must have been devastating for her.

By the time she reached Constantinople, Theodora has been transformed – at least internally. She avoided the theater as well as the streets and found work spinning fabric, a humble but modestly respectable trade. She’d also become a devout woman committed to her religious faith. That’s where things will eventually get complicated.

Really complicated.

But that’s down the road. For now, we have a contrite Theodora, sitting at her spinning wheel, seeking Heaven’s approval, when Justinian somehow happens by. At 20, she’s half his age, but no doubt still quite a draw and certainly wisened by the years. Her past was at that point largely past, and it’s unlikely Justinian would have recognized her name or heard the stories. We don’t really have reliable accounts of exactly when they met or how their relationship first developed, but it seems likely that Justinian was drawn not only to her “maturing” beauty but her sharp wit and insight, now tempered by experience. It says nothing negative about Theodora if she jumped at the opportunity to nurture that interest. He was older, educated, and clearly on his way to bigger things – maybe she could come with?

Empress Theodora

When Justinian and Theodora first became a thing, Justinian was the trusted advisor and second-in-command to Emperor Justin I. (The similarity in their names is no coincidence – Justin was Justinian’s uncle and Justinian chose his name as an act of shameless flattery. His given name was “Flavius.”) While this was a great position to be in politically, it was inconvenient personally; the law prevented men in his position from marrying women with backgrounds like Theodora’s. It didn’t help that Justin’s wife simply could not stand the girl. Justinian and Theodora were free to do, you know… what people in love do – but officially, they’d have to bide their time.

Several years later, Justin I died and Justinian was the logical successor – especially after he had his only serious rivals murdered right there in the throne room. That meant the Empress no longer held formal sway over his life choices, and it was no real difficulty for him to simply change the laws which had prohibited their coupling.

Justinian I took the throne with Empress Theodora by his side.

The Nika Riots

In 532 CE, during Justinian’s fifth year on the throne, he faced the first real challenge of his rule. Political unrest had been growing as the emperor raised taxes and appointed abusively innovative men to help collect them. A botched execution and some weird crowd participation at the chariot races sparked this frustration into widespread rioting which continued for days. Much of Constantinople was burned down and Justinian’s efforts to pacify the masses did little to slow the destruction. These days are remembered as the Nika Riots.

Things went badly enough that Justinian and several of his top commanders eventually began planning their escape. One pictures them throwing robes, goblets, and scrolls into gilded trunks while racing around the room frantically – although in reality they were no doubt handling the situation with manly aplomb. (Dudes hate looking wigged in front of other dudes, and even more so in the presence of estrogen.) Nevertheless, it was time to get the #$%& out of Constantinople.

That’s when Theodora stepped in and spoke her peace:

My lords, it may be unseemly for a woman to add her voice to the affairs of men, but the situation at the moment is too serious for me to hold my tongue. We must focus on the wisest course of action – not ceremony or tradition.

In my opinion, fleeing is not the right course, even if it did somehow bring us to safety. It is impossible for a person, having been born into this world, to forever avoid death; but for one who has reigned it is intolerable to be a fugitive. May I never be deprived of this purple robe, and may I never see the day when those who meet me do not call me “Empress.”

If you wish to save yourself, my lord, there is certainly no difficulty. We are rich; over there is the sea, and yonder are the ships. But reflect for a moment whether, once you have escaped to a place of security, you would not gladly exchange that safety for death. As for me, I agree with the adage that purple is the noblest shroud.

The Color Purple

Theodora’s closing statement is sometimes translated as “I would rather die as royalty” or some variation thereof. Purple was so closely associated with and limited to royalty that official approval or high office were often referred to simply as “the purple.” An officer promoted to duty in the royal chambers was “elevated to the purple.” Royal children were “born in the purple,” and so on. (Naturally, any outside use of the color – even if somehow available – was strictly forbidden.) So… the “royalty” translation is thus accurate enough, but it lacks the flourish one might reasonably expect of someone brought up in the theater and extremely gifted at producing pretty much any emotion or reaction she wished in her “audience.”

Theodora’s rhetorical skill doesn’t imply deception or insincerity; there’s every reason to believe she meant precisely what she said. She’d been a commoner, and she’d lost the throne once before (in Northern Africa). She had no interest in repeating either experience. “Purple is the noblest shroud” was not merely poetic; it was a poignant reminder of what it meant to be truly “royal.” it was a statement of values, and self, and a worldview not easily forsaken once attained.

On a more practical level, the speech was a bit of a shamer as well – “Of course we could run, but… is that really who we want to be? I’d rather take my chances here and die at the top than hide at the bottom.” And it worked. Justinian and crew decided that perhaps they hadn’t exhausted their other options after all. They regrouped and ended up slaughtering tens of thousands of malcontents until order was restored.

Which I suppose counts as a “win.”

The city was rebuilt (the Hagia Sophia is particularly nice) and Justinian would go on to do lots of important stuff – not the least of which was his famous “Code of Justinian,” which formed an important link in the evolution of western legal systems. Theodora would stick around as well, often supporting Justinian and other times subverting him – especially in matters of faith. For the moment, however, she’d locked herself into history as a strong female, using the tools at her disposal to improve her situation and standing firm when those around her were about to break.

She remains, in our collective memory, forever shrouded in that purple she so craved. While she’d hardly qualify as “hero” or “role model,” she certainly at least earned that.

Chasing Justinian & Theodora

Justinian & TheodoraI spend most of my “work” hours outside the classroom reading World History textbooks these days – not to evaluate them, but to absorb enough content to effectively run my classroom.

I don’t actually mind; I like the whole “learning” thing. I know some general history and I’ve picked up enough random knowledge over the years that I don’t feel completely ignorant – at least not constantly. Still, it’s a legit challenge – every day, every chapter, every thoughtful student question to which I have only the vaguest idea how to respond.

The textbook I inherited is not my favorite, but it sometimes catches my attention with rhetoric like this:

“Then, in 533 C.E… with the empire’s borders reasonably secure, a new emperor, Justinian, tried to reconquer western territory in a last futile effort to restore an empire of Rome. He was somber, autocratic, and prone to grandiose ideas.”

Well that’s rather poetic. And it gets better:

“A contemporary historian… described him as ‘at once villainous and amenable; as people say colloquially, a moron. He was never truthful with anyone, but always guileful in what he said and did, yet easily hoodwinked by any wanted to deceive him.’”

OK, full disclosure: when I first read that bit, I immediately thought of a certain current political leader and wondered if there were enough similarities to justify a snarky blog post – writing about one while actually talking about the other. The kind of highbrow stuff for which I’m damn near famous.  

Then came the clincher:

“The emperor was also heavily influenced by his power-hungry wife Theodora, a courtesan connected with Constantinople’s horse-racing world. Theodora stiffened Justinian’s resolve… and pushed the plans for expansion.”

You may find these summaries a bit loaded, and you’d be right. But such broad, judgmental strokes are not fatal flaws so much as necessary compromises. We’re covering 10,000ish years in roughly 160 class periods; there’s simply not time to debate or analyze every individual or circumstance. Yes, we examine contrasting points of view and practice all the usual social studies skills – but we save that stuff for debating whether the Mongols were “barbarians” or inferring motives for the Crusades. Justinian and his bride are minor figures in the grand narrative, and for them to have any meaning at all, someone has to frame them memorably and then move on.

Still, they caught my attention. I looked them up in the textbook I actually like and discovered that Justinian merited only a passing mention. Theodora was omitted completely. A third text doesn’t name either of them.

Huh.

The next step, of course, was Wikipedia. (I’ll pause and give some of you a moment to regain your composure.)

Say what you like about the world’s largest online encyclopedia, but eight times out of ten, Wikipedia has just enough information, front-loaded with the most important bits, to scratch that academic itch. I wouldn’t cite them for my doctoral thesis, but if you’re trying to understand the Green Corn Rebellion or figure out how many different Mesopotamian rulers called themselves “Sargon” at some point, it’s a helluva place to start.

And no, I’m not on their payroll. I wish.

In this case, though, the site did its job too well. The more I learned about Justinian and Theodora, the further I drifted from my safe, general overview of the Byzantine Empire. Two days and a 70+ page color-coded, cut’n’pasted Word docx later and I’m still on this dysfunctional rabbit trail near their woods, uncertain how to leave but unable to get closer.

Justinian & TheodoraTwo separate histories of Justinian and Theodora were written during their rule. That’s great, except that they disagree repeatedly, and parts of each are difficult to swallow even without contradictory evidence. Oh – and they were written by the same guy. Other than that, we have only official reports and third-party accounts and the usual never-quite-enough-ness of history. Of such bizarre threads is history sometimes woven.

Justinian was often called “the emperor who never sleeps.” He was passionately committed to doing God’s will, but comfortable utilizing great brutality in the process. He came closer than any other ruler to restoring the Roman Empire which had fallen centuries before (leaving only the eastern half – the Byzantines – although they thought of themselves simply as Romans). He devoted untold hours attempting to personally resolve theological disputes fracturing the church. He compiled and clarified centuries of contradictory and jumbled Roman statutes and legal precedents, editing the whole mess down to a single manageable volume to bring stability to the courts and consistency to the universities. He’s remembered as the Byzantine Empire’s greatest ruler, one of its biggest heroes, and one of its worst oppressors.

How can you not love him already?

Theodora is even better. The woman who would become his queen began life as the daughter of – wait for it – a bear-keeper. How does one make a living keeping bears, you may well ask? Well, he worked for the Greens at the Hippodrome. Where they held the chariot races. Against the Blues. And seemingly orchestrated other entertainment as well, some portion of which presumably involved bears. These events could also be a form of political protest, or an expression of violent rivalry between social classes. Unless maybe they couldn’t. 

No one’s sure what happened to the Reds or Whites, but they were probably absorbed by the Blues and the Greens, or simply fell out of popularity over time. They definitely weren’t there for the riots where the crowds chanted “Nike! Nike! Nike!” until Justinian had his soldiers block the exits and slaughter them all with swords. Or maybe he bribed the Blues to leave first and only 30,000 Greens died. He’d always favored the Blues. Unless he killed them all, I mean.  

I’m not making any of this up.

As a young woman, Theodora had become an actress and a… naughty mime of some sort? – seducing and having sex-for-money with men of means well-before her 16th birthday. Other than being particularly good at it, none of this was considered unusual or shocking, although it didn’t do much for her social status in the eyes of respectable people. Then again, what does one expect from the daughter of a bear-keeper?

That’s a real question. I have no idea what would have been expected.

Theodora converted to Christianity in her late teens and became a humble cloth-maker, eventually somehow meeting Justinian. The ruler-to-be had to wait for his first wife to die, and then change some laws so he could legally marry Theodora, although that didn’t prevent some pre-marital scoodlypoopin’. Theodora was brilliant and creative and stubborn and beautiful. She served as unofficial co-ruler with Justinian, promoting legal protections for women, strengthening punishments for those who abused the weak, and opening a home for former prostitutes who wanted to clean up their lives.

At the same time, she demanded absurdly self-debasing rituals from any who wished to enter her presence. She involved herself in religious disputes, even when it meant opposing her husband. Theodora also had a lot to do with that “kill all the protestors” thing above.

She was not what you might call ‘demure.’

J & TSo what started as fleeting curiosity over a comment in Chapter 10 has taken over my life temporarily, with little to show for it. At some point I’m going to need to let this go and get back to the essentials. I have classes to teach, after all.

But not yet.

My goal here isn’t to make sense of Justinian or Theodora – I’m not sure I can, although I’ll probably write something about them eventually. Right now, though, I share this tangent as a reminder of how complicated basic narratives can become once you shift perspective or gain new information. It’s sobering that for all of our compiled knowledge, research, and analysis, we can’t even say with any certainty what it was like for Theodora to grow up in a world of gladiatorial combat – unless it was actually more of a vaudeville/variety show – which might actually have been a circus – or a strip club – or NASCAR.

Or some combination of these. As long as bears were involved.

And let’s not forget that different times and places and people and events took place in different times and places and involved different people and events. Sure, there are human universals – people fall in love, kill one another for power, favor those most like themselves, etc.  But other fundamental realities are radically different from era to era, and from place to place. The relation of parent to child, the role of faith in economic interactions, assumptions about diseases, food, or sex – these sorts of things are unpredictable when you jump contexts. They’re often hard to understand even once you’re aware of them.

Going deeper at this point would mean reading a few actual books, then patient research on my own. I might need to travel a bit, consult with experts, and immerse myself in learning the times, the cultures, the language, the –

You get the idea.

That won’t be happening any time soon. I’m trying to finish off the Byzantines so we can wrap up the Islamic Empire, give some context to the Crusades, and start the Renaissance only a week later than I’d hoped. And in that context, Justinian and Theodora simply aren’t that important. I just don’t have the time to spend on them – not if I’m going to keep up with the rest of my priorities. They’ll simply have to wait.

Still…

A bear-keeper?

Maybe just a few more days.

RELATED POST: Sargon & Eve

RELATED POST: Rabbit Trails: Criminal Intimacy & Pernicious Polygamy

RELATED POST: Rabbit Trails: Mary Sallade & The One-Eyed Pickpocket