My Teaching Philosophy

Dammit JanetIt’s inherently vain to post lesson ideas, particulary those including thoughts on how to teach something in this or that situation. Most everyone reading this blog or receiving the email updates already does many things better than me and even more stuff of which I’ve never even thought. And yet…

When I have teachers share their own ‘best ideas’ in workshops, they usually hate the part where they’re sharing, but love the part where other people are demonstrating what they do. Sometimes new teachers just need some ‘seed’ ideas to get going, or to add some variety to their relatively young toolbox. Some of my favorite blog posts in the past six months have been other teachers sharing what they’re doing in class, or their personal pedagogy. 

So I’ve been gradually building a Classroom Resources section to Blue Cereal. Parts of it are being used regularly, if Google Analytics has any validity. Others… well, they’re still in progress.

But it’s June. Let’s talk about Skills. 

[[{“type”:”media”,”view_mode”:”media_small”,”fid”:”3″,”attributes”:{“alt”:””,”class”:”media-image”,”typeof”:”foaf:Image”}}]]

Actually I just wanted to work in that clip. We’ll talk classroom strategies, but first let’s talk Teaching Philosophy. Why listen to someone tell you WHAT to do or HOW to do it if you don’t share any common ground as to WHY?

Panda Vomits RainbowsIf you’ve been with me in a workshop setting, or know me at all, you know I’m a big fan of trusting teachers to know what’s best for their students in their reality in their subject. We absolutely MUST stretch ourselves as professionals, and push past our so-called ‘comfort zones’, yes. Always. But at the other end of that reasoning is a contrasting but equally important truth – follow your gut. Listen to the experts, trust those you trust, think with your brain, but when it’s time – trust yourself.

Kinda touchy-feely, right?

Nothing I model in workshops, write in instructions, or post on this website is intended to be even a little prescriptive. None of it’s static. At best it’s a series of efforts to capture some small part of a mindset, the expressions of which will vary greatly by time, place, grade level, student realities, class expectations, and your personal styles & preferences. The important thing on which to focus is this: everything you’ve done up until now is wrong and backwards and you’re ruining the future. 

Just kidding, except for about four of you – and you know who you are.  Actually my philosophy is closer to this:

The Learning Happens in the Struggle

I totally stole this from Ayn Grubb in Tulsa Public, but she never reads my stuff so she’ll never know. Besides, teachers justify pretty much everything in the name of “IT’S FOR THE CHILDREN.”

‘Point A’ is where students are when they come to us – what they know, what they can do, what they think it’s all about, etc. Lest this visual seem overly simplistic, keep in mind that all 168 of your little darlings start at a different ‘Point A’, so already there’s a challenge to this whole ‘teaching’ thing.

‘Point B’ is where you’d ideally like to get them by the time they walk out of your class at the end of the year – what they really need to know, should be able to do, and their mindset about your subject and learning and all that stuff. All of ‘Point B’ is important, even though well-intentioned equally idealistic people are going to suggest in sneaky ways that it’s not. The content matters – our lil’ darlings won’t all just personal-journey-of-discovery it on their own. The skills matter as well, no matter how special and precious and unique and misunderstood Mummy thinks her baby be. (“He’s just not a writer – he’s more of a ramble-incoherently-while-I-swoon style of learner, and I think it’s wrong to try to force them to all be the same!”)  

But here’s the thing…

That middle part, what we often refer to euphemistically as ‘the journey’? Yeah, that part matters a whole lotta lot as well, and it’s the part we tend to shortchange. 

My best students come to me never having broken an academic sweat in their lives. School has never been difficult for them, and while they are sometimes rather detached from any real value or purpose for any of it, they play the game and their teachers just LOVE them and they all have 104% in every class. The flip side of this is that the first time they’re confused by a concept or struggle with an expectation, they think either I’m unreasonable and/or insane, OR that – oh no, what if – maybe they’re stupid after all!?! 

Neither of these is normally the case. 

It’s OK that it’s hard. It’s OK that you’re confused. It’s even OK if you fail from time to time – an idea we seem to worship when it’s time to buy motivational posters but loathe when it’s even hinted at in real life.

Demotivational Challenges

The students I’ve failed most unforgivably aren’t just those who get an ‘F’ in my class but those who pass through without ever being stretched or challenged or forced to outdo themselves a little. This is trendy to say at the moment, but that doesn’t make it less true – struggling and failing and recovering and refiguring and adjusting and attempting and moving forward until you crash and burn again… that’s called ‘learning’.

If they don’t learn to risk, succeed, fail, get confused, frustrated, have epiphanies, rewind, triumph, etc, with ME when it’s relatively SAFE and I love them and desperately WANT THEM TO MAKE IT, one of two things will happen: (1) They’ll learn these lessons in much more painful ways later in high school, college, marriages, careers, parenting, etc., when the stakes are much higher and there’s no tutoring in the library at lunch, or (2) They won’t learn them, and their life will suck.  

The learning happens in the struggle. If there’s no struggle, there’s very little real learning. This is a whole prolonged thing we could discuss, but for now I’m just laying it out there as my personal philosophy.

For those of you who are deeply and emotionally invested in the whole ‘grit’ argument, keep in mind that students whose entire worlds are all about chaos and struggle and despair require a slightly different sort of assistance. If the comfortable kids need to be made uncomfortable, it is equally true that sometimes the best thing you can do for a child of dysfunction is provide a little security and predictability in their daily experience. And maybe some protein.

I realize that was a painful amount of hope and inspiration for some of you, but that’s what you get with me – pandas and rainbows. I believe that children are the future. Teach them well and let them – well, you get the idea.

[[{“type”:”media”,”view_mode”:”media_small”,”fid”:”146″,”attributes”:{“alt”:””,”class”:”media-image”,”typeof”:”foaf:Image”}}]]

 

NEXT: Asking Good Questions (And You Don’t Have To Mean It)

Let’s Get Pedagogical

Boo Berry BoxI started blogging in March 2014, when the thoughts I had regarding the then-upcoming #oklaed rally demanded the world’s attention. (You see this wit and wisdom as a gift; I alone understand they are my burden to carry.)

A few months later I was halfway ‘round the world in a wrap-up session for a teacher workshop with which I’d been privileged to assist, and wishing there were a workable way to preserve or share some of the strategies, materials, and other ideas we’d discussed that week – something more than a notebook or a flash drive or even the miracle that is Dropbox. 

I’ve visited lesson plan websites before, and most of them… well, they don’t do much for me. This may simply be because I’m a teacher snob, or because those busy being amazing educators have little time to walk me through their mysterious ways. They may even have lives after school – better things to do than this

Maybe I’m just not looking correctly. For all I know, there are dozens of great secondary History/ELA sites which I’m simply too clueless to have discovered. I’ll probably get links to all of them in response to this post – for which I’ll be legitimately grateful. 

Computerized LearningOr maybe it just doesn’t work that way. I have zero concern public school teachers can ever be replaced by computers on a meaningful scale, for example, because the human interaction, connection, and persuasion is simply too major a factor in dragging these little darlings into the light – if only for those brief moments. And if fancy software can’t teach my kids as effectively as a minimally competent nose-breather with a bachelor’s degree, how can a website become any more useful a resource than those ancillaries we used to get so excited about at new textbook time? (May the edu-gods forgive us for the decisions we made based on transparencies and test-maker discs.)

But maybe the only way to talk about teaching is to be physically together, TALKING about TEACHING.

Elementary LessonBesides, most lesson plan sites are elementary and early middle school heavy – which I totally get. We expect teachers at that level to cover everything in every possible style with all kids for the entire day. There are a few sites heavy on the Powerpoints or educational video clips, etc., which have been useful for starting ideas from time to time. I’m absolutely NOT knocking anyone’s site or resources. They just weren’t doing anything for me

But despite all that, the vanity of even considering… I mean… seriously? A teacher resource site?

Blogging is one thing – it’s challenging enough, and the time it takes, and never really knowing if it matters, and yet there are your innards, time-stamped and misspelled, for all the world to browse without comment or to ignore while you pretend not to care because you’re not doing it for that, dammit! 

At least I’ve heard that’s what it’s like for others. It’s brought me nothing but admiration and adoration across the edu-blogosphere. But I do so try to stay in tune with the little people. 

Dr. FrankensteinTo begin posting 15 years of my favorite lessons, materials, ideas – most borrowed from sources I don’t even remember and modified on the fly no matter how many times I use them – is insane, right? Much of the flavor has to be lost in translation. Too much explaining is limiting, and insulting to teachers perfectly capable of figuring out how to make an idea work in their reality; too little explaining leaves new teachers or those looking to try new things without enough to go on. 

Most people already do this stuff anyway, right? Or if they don’t, maybe it’s because there are so many better ways to do it. Or this other reason, or that factor over there, and what about – ? 

The reasons it’s a horrible idea are legion. But I moved from a blog to an actual website to allow for the possibility, and for a year now I’ve done only minimal work on that part of things while focusing on wowing the world with my insights, charm, and general lack of decency or shame once I’m riled about something. 

But it’s time. 

The feeling won’t go away – the gut desire to try it. To go big or go home. Time to put some of those favorite platitudes to the test: 

“The Learning Happens in the Struggle” 

“Better to be Wrong than to be Afraid” 

and 

“Irresponsibility: No Single Raindrop Believes It Is To Blame for the Flood” 

(That last one is on the wall of my classroom next to several other Demotivational posters I find to be far more true and thus far more useful than the traditional pablum involving bicyclists silhouetted on mountain tops.) 

Get To Work

So, as the #11FF have already noticed, I’ve been slightly less active on the tweeter thing and somewhat less prolific in the bloggery as I wrestle with what and how in regards to waxing pedagogical. But it’s gradually being built, and pushed out there. 

Help yourself. If there’s something you already know, or already do better, skip it. If there’s anything you like or find interesting, help yourself. If there’s anything you want, it doesn’t hurt to ask. If I have it, I’ll see what I can do. If not, I may know a guy who knows a guy… The plan is to keep adding things as time allows and inspiration dictates. Right now it’s rather minimal – but if I wait until it’s “done” to push it out, well… you know the rest.

If you’re not particularly hard up for the basics, but need something engaging and low-stress to do during or after testing, I’m pretty proud of these document activities

My only request is that if you use something and it works particularly well, or if you change it in some way that makes it better, or even if you discover a fatal flaw not anticipated by the materials or the instructions, drop me a line. It’s not personal at this point – it’s really just an effort to put some things out there for people to use if and when it’s helpful. 

Because how cool would that be?

Wax On; Wax Off