The Gettysburg Address, Part Three (Lincoln’s Big ‘But’)

Gettysburg Address CopyThis one’s a little longer than I normally like – a fact which isn’t exactly helped by adding 54 words up front to tell you so. I wanted to wrap this one up, but couldn’t bring myself to cut more than I already have. For the #11FF actually plowing through these with me, my apologies

Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. 

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation — or any nation so conceived and so dedicated — can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. 

BUT –

This may be the most powerful word in the English language. This ‘but’, at least, is a BIG, BIG BUT. And it belongs to President Lincoln.

Sir Mix A LotI like it, and I cannot lie.

“Gary, you’re such a great guy. You’re funny, you’re smart, and it’s been such an amazing past four months together. Any girl would be lucky to have you as her boyfriend… BUT-“ 

You know what’s coming, don’t you? 

“Ms. Terry, we appreciate your hard work over the past year and your creativity with kids. You’ve handled some tough circumstances as you prepared them for their CRTs… BUT-“

‘But’ can overturn everything that’s come before. Whatever follows is often MORE powerful as a result, like pulling back on the rubber band before letting it go. Here, Lincoln uses his big ‘but’ to take his message an entirely different direction suddenly and powerfully. 

But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate — we cannot consecrate — we cannot hallow — this ground.  

Rubber Band Hand GunWhat beautiful sentence structure. He’s already hit us with repeated uses of ‘dedicate’ in the opening segment. Either he needs a thesaurus, or he’s intentionally layering in a theme before becoming more specific with his thesis. 

In class, we stop to define ‘dedicate’, and I ask for examples of things commonly dedicated – a tree, a book, a building, a scholarship in someone’s memory. ‘Dedicate’ can be pretty intense, like the baby dedication I mentioned last time, or mostly fun, like requesting a song on the radio for Marcia Stiflewagon, who looks awkward in a dress but kinda hot in her weightlifting gear. 

Then Lincoln takes it up a notch. ‘Consecrate’. We define this as well. There are fewer examples of things commonly ‘consecrated’ – sacramental bread, wine, marriages, etc. It’s getting’ all spiritual up in Gettysburg – and they were only about 90 seconds into his speech.

The Deathly Hallows

And there’s a third and final step.

We can’t ‘hallow’ this ground either. That’s a tough one. No one uses this word in normal conversation. Given some prodding, students will connect ‘Halloween,’ although they don’t generally know where that comes from either. Some reference Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – that kinda brushes the concept for which we’re reaching.

When I was a kid, every day during announcements we recited the Lord’s Prayer, right after the Pledge of Allegiance. (I know, I know – it was a different time and place, and no one thought much of it, at least not that I was aware.) And of course we used the King James version, which began like this:

“Our Father, which art in Heaven, hallowed be Thy name…” 

Eucharist

The name of Jehovah (Yahweh) was so sacred, one did not commonly say it aloud. You don’t tug on Superman’s cape, you don’t draw cartoons of Mohammed, and you don’t speak this particular name of God lightly – let alone ‘in vain’. Like touching the Ark of the Covenant or entering the Holy of Holies without proper cleansing, some things were so divine as to be dangerous.  

Holy can be serious business.  

So we came here to dedicate this ground, and that’s fine. But really… we can’t. Can’t dedicate it. (*up a notch*) Can’t consecrate it. (*up another*) Can’t hallow this ground. 

We’re suddenly in sanctified territory – and rather unexpectedly. Why, Mr. President? Why can’t we do this? 

The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract.  

Holy of HoliesThis part is difficult for my kids. Even those who are Sunday-go-to-Meetin’ types don’t really do much super-sacred any more. We talk about what these ‘brave men’ must have done to ‘consecrate’ that ground. They came, they fought, they died, all for a hypothesis about men being created equal, according to Lincoln.

All of this is true, and all important.

But more specifically, most of them shed their blood. They bled into the soil – literally. And in the Christian faith (for by now it’s obvious this is Lincoln’s chosen framework), blood has power. 

In the Old Testament, sin and failure were purged through animal sacrifice. The rules regarding what you could and couldn’t do with blood were rather detailed. In the New, it was Jesus on the Cross who offers redemption. Subsequent discussions of this sacrifice often specifically reference the shedding of blood, and if you came back in time with me to that little church where I grew up, you’d find us singing about it all the time.

Church Singing“Would you be free from your burden of sin? There’s POWER in the BLOOD, POWER in the BLOOD…” 

“Are you washed in the Blood? In the soul-cleansing blood of the Lamb?” 

“What can wash away my sin? Nothing but the blood of Jesus…” 

Lincoln is calling up the most sacred imagery of the Christian faith – one everyone in his audience understood and most practiced on at least a superficial level. He’s declaring the soil on which they stand – in which these men were now buried – to be ‘consecrated’ by the blood spilled there defending this hypothesis.

“We’re here with words, and songs, and good intentions, sure!” he says. “But they DIED here, violently and valiantly, for this cause. What in the world could we add with some WORDS?” 

The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here.  

Did Lincoln know this was ironic when he said it? I have no idea. 

So, Mr. President… why ARE we here? 

It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain –

Baby AmericaThat’s a mouthful, and the hardest part for students to memorize when they’re reciting it to the class for extra credit. Lincoln’s word-weaving turns the purpose of the occasion, the war, and the entire nation inside out – bringing to the foreground the ideals we still espoused, but had long since negated through abuse and neglect. 

These men died for something, and now continuing that something is on US. On YOU. The power of martyrdom multiplied by the thousands, and the obligations of a loved one’s final wishes, combined on sacred ground. Dedicated, dedicated, devotion, devotion, resolve not died in vain.

Put down your corn dogs and tiny Union flags, kids – the President just called us out. And he did it without actually saying anything we didn’t already agree with. 

Baby ‘Merica was born 87 years ago, in Liberty, and dedicated to a hypothesis – that all men are created equal. In youth, it was noble and pure and full of the idealism captured in the Declaration of Independence – our national birth certificate. Growing pains brought complications, and it began compromising those ideals for the most pragmatic reasons… little realizing that such leaven almost always leavens the entire loaf.

And now, through war with ourselves, we’ve died. Many literally, the rest emotionally and spiritually. Blood has washed the ground, re-consecrating us and making possible the realization of that hypothesis – we CAN build and maintain a nation founded on the principle that all men are created equal. 

that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom –  

Easter BunniesLazarus, John Baptizing in the Jordan, Jesus emerging from the tomb – it’s all about the rebirth, baby. There’s a reason we hunt eggs (of all things) on Easter. 

We were born once, but we ate the apple of vanity and compromise, and died. Now it’s time to be ‘born again’.  

and that government of the people, by the people, for the people,

Which people?

WHICH PEOPLE? He never says it, but it couldn’t be more clear.

shall not perish from the earth. 

For those of you who aren’t Sunday-go-to-Meetin’ types, things are different once you’re born again. You’re purified, more true to what you were created to be, and you don’t die a second time.

And you don’t keep it to yourself. You try to pass along the good news to others – that any nation so conceived, and so dedicated, can in fact ‘long endure’.

Afterward: I couldn’t end on such a positive note without acknowledging my grief and disappointment where we are 150 years later after all of that. As the Israelites longed to go back to Egypt (for the onions, no less), as dogs return to their vomit and pigs to wallow in their mud, we seem to cling as a nation to the same vanity, hypocrisy, and violence which took us into that war. I don’t have an answer or wish to be a downer, but I couldn’t wrap up in good conscience without expressing that I love the speech, I love the ideals, I love the nation – but in so many ways we’re further than ever from what we proclaim to be. It hurts my innards to contemplate.

G.A. Incomplete

RELATED POST: The Gettysburg Address, Part One (After Everett)

RELATED POST: The Gettysburg Address, Part Two (Dedicated to a Proposition)

The Gettysburg Address, Part Two (Dedicated to a Proposition)

Lincoln LooserWhen I talk about this speech in workshops, I never know how much to assume teachers already know, or whether my ‘givens’ and their ‘givens’ are likely to be compatible. We cover so many different things in so many different ways… there’s very little we can assume to be universal in Social Studies content knowledge (or pedagogy, for that matter). And that’s OK.

It’s much less complicated with students, who are gracious enough to hardly know anything ever – even if we’ve actually covered it explicitly only moments before!

All to say, this is just my take on the speech. It’s not exactly original – I mean, I read books from time to time and pick up things here and there – but I don’t think I’ve lifted it whole from any one source. If I’m mistaken, please let me know so I can give credit where due. The uninterrupted text is in the previous post if you wish to revisit before proceeding. I’ll wait.

*tap tap tap tap tap tap*

OK?

Four score and seven years ago,

We all know this one, right? If ‘score’ = 20, then ‘four score’ = 80… plus 7, 87 years ago. Lincoln gave this speech in 1863, so a little basic math takes us to 1776. Duh.

This matters because Lincoln COULD have talked about the Constitution, ratified around 1788. That was, after all, the document we were supposedly at war defending – the one purporting to form a ‘more perfect union’ than the rather anemic Articles of Confederation which it replaced. But he didn’t.

Lincoln points instead to the year of the Declaration of Independence – the ‘birth’ of our nation and a written statement not only of rebellion, but of ideals. The Constitution has rules about running for the Senate and requiring the various states to play nicely together; the Declaration proclaims all men are created equal, and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights. The Constitution is functional, but birthed in compromise and politics. The Declaration is idealistic and uninterested in practicalities – it glows and pretty music plays whenever we close our eyes and call its name three times.

our fathers

Lincoln BiologyWhy do we call them our ‘fathers’? What makes someone a ‘father’?

I’m not looking for one of those deep, Level Three, English class answers (“What color is honor? What food would gerunds be if books were meals?”). Biologically – literally – what’s the difference between a ‘dude’ and a ‘dad’?

That’s right – offspring. Making bebbies.

brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in Liberty,

Conceived? I always ask what this word means, and we take a bit to discuss.

My students are all in Biology class the same year I have them for American Government. That means at some point they’ll be shown the most fascinating little film. A gang of angry tadpoles, possibly albinos, are chasing down and attacking a golf ball which has presumably done them wrong. Eventually, one will break through, and go in to ransack the place while the rest lose interest and wander off to die. These are very single-minded albino tadpoles.

THAT moment – that’s “conception.” 

It’s different from birth, although we often use them interchangeably. But ‘conceived’ is that earliest moment of new life – and it matters where and how you’re conceived. Maybe it shouldn’t, but it does. If your parents are rich, you’ll gestate differently than if they’re poor. If your parents are Eskimos, chances are good you’ll be Eskimo-ish before even being born.  And if you’re the result of Liberty and Founding Fathers getting busy…

and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

I grew up in a pretty orthodox Protestant church. Baby dedications were a big thing. The lil’un would be brought up to the front of the church, we’d ooh and ahh a bit, and the Preacher Man would pray for the tiny critter, the parents, etc. The idea was to ‘dedicate’ the child to God as he or she grows up.

GA CoverBut Baby ‘Merica isn’t dedicated to God – at least according to Lincoln . (Don’t tell the Republicans!) It’s dedicated to an idea, a proposition – that all men are created equal.

What IS a ‘proposition’? We talk about this term in class as well. There are various sorts of ‘propositions’ – I may have a business idea in which I’d like for you to join me, or perhaps I’ll ask you to marry me. In those Science classes I referenced earlier, though, they use a different word for their kinds of propositions.

They call them ‘hypotheses’ – official-sounding ideas about how things work or what they do. And do you know what we do with a hypothesis, once formulated?

You test it, to see if it works.

I dunno… maybe I’m overthinking this. Lincoln learned most of what he knew reading by the fireplace late at night. It’s really not fair to attribute all of this ‘Enlightenment’ style thinking to him when he’s just trying to give a motivational speech. I’ll shut up and we’ll continue with what he actually said.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war,

I always stop here and ask my kids which civil war he means. It usually takes them a second to figure out how to say what they’re sure is correct. “THE Civil War – the ONE THEY’RE IN.”

Yep. And why were we fighting this war?

testing whether that nation — or any nation so conceived and so dedicated — can long endure. 

HA! I SO CALLED THAT ONE! I TOLD YOU HE WAS DOING IT ON PURPOSE! **SmugHappyDance**

We have our hypothesis – that ‘all men are created equal’. It’s right there in our own Declaration of Independence. We built an entire nation on this premise, conceived in ‘Liberty’ by our ‘Fathers’. Now we’re testing that hypothesis.

Lincoln Action FigureDoes that work? This… ‘all men are created equal’ – can you run a country based on that, or will it fail?

Note that the results aren’t merely for us – that would be pressure enough. This war, according to Lincoln, is about whether THIS nation can survive built on this hypothesis, and by extension whether ANY nation with similar values – so conceived and so dedicated – can long endure. 

We are met on a great battlefield of that war.

Which battlefield would that be? Come now, I know you know this one. I’ll wait…

We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. 

Wait, what?

It’s worth stopping at this point to make sure we’re all on the same page – especially since Lincoln is setting us up. We’re gathered to dedicate a cemetery, some ground, for those who died in this war.

Died… why? So “that nation might live.” That nation dedicated to the proposition that “all men are created equal.” To prove that this was true, and that you can build a country on such a foundation. They died, according to Lincoln, to prove a hypothesis.

Lincoln ProfileThis, incidentally, would have been news to many of the men being honored that day. Most thought they were fighting for the Constitution, the Union, maybe their states or families, or just because they were annoyed with the people on the other side. A few sensed the long game, but it was hardly the norm.

It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

Well, that’s a relief, given the months of planning and the four hours we’ve already been standing here doing it. Woulda been a shame to find out it was all one big faux pas.

But,

But.

But?

But!

‘But’ may be one of the most powerful and underrated words in the English language. And this ‘but’ – Lincoln’s ‘but’ – is a big one. That’s right. Lincoln had a very big ‘but’, and we’re going to look at it next time.

RELATED POST: The Gettysburg Address, Part One (After Everett)

RELATED POST: The Gettysburg Address, Part Three (Lincoln’s Big ‘But’)

The Gettysburg Address, Part One (After Everett)

Battle of GettysburgThe Battle of Gettysburg was a three-day conflagration resulting from Robert E. Lee’s second and final attempt to bring the Civil War into the North, in hopes citizens therein would tire of the fighting and tell their elected leaders – Lincoln in particular – to knock it off.

Those first three days of July, 1863, produced the sorts of epic moments and sickening body counts that made the war so grand and so terrible both then and in retrospect. You may have seen the movie, based on Michael Shaara’s The Killer Angels – one of the few history movies shot entirely in real time.

That’s a joke about how damn long it is. It’s a really long movie.

Yep.

The battle was a critical turning point in the Eastern Theater of the war – a series of all-or-nothing melees culminating in the devastating “Pickett’s Charge,” in which the Confederates lost nearly half the men who charged proudly up Cemetery Ridge in hopes of overwhelming the entrenched Union forces awaiting them at the top.

The Union held, and the South was devastated beyond the point of possible recovery.

Black Troops Civil WarThe same month saw the fall of Vicksburg in the Western Theater, the rapidly growing acceptance of black soldiers in the Union after Denzel Washington and Matthew Broderick martyred themselves in the attack on Fort Wagner, and the pivotal Battle of Honey Springs in Indian Territory (the ‘Gettysburg of the West’, according to my state-approved Oklahoma History textbook).

I’m serious about that last one only insofar as the book really does say that. But the other events were legit turning points. After Gettysburg and the rest of July 1863, the war was effectively decided.

That didn’t prevent it’s continuing for two more years, but that’s a subject for another post.

The small town of Gettysburg was left with 50,000+ dead soldiers to bury. The armies had done what they could, but the nature of war and the limited ground with which to work meant that it wasn’t long before local dogs or other animals were showing up in town with body parts as chew toys. Farmers trying to plow would run into limbs protruding from the earth. And once it rained…

Gettysburg CemeteryIt wasn’t decent, and it certainly wasn’t healthy.

Fast-forward to the christening of a massive cemetery, conceived and designed with a level of cooperation between state and national government which was not at all the norm of the times. The ceremony to dedicate the new grounds featured preachers praying prayers, choirs singing songs, and Edward Everett – the preeminent orator of his day.

Everett captivated the crowd with his three-hour speech summarizing the battle, the men, the cause, and whatever else you might ask for in the Director’s Cut of your favorite DVD. Contrary to what you were probably told as a kid, he was a hit – people loved that stuff back then because they had what was called “an attention span”, with a side of “absolutely nothing better to do all day.”

Lincoln at GettysburgPresident Lincoln was invited as well, but unlike today the presence of the President did not automatically presume he would become central to everything else. Lincoln’s role was to give some closing comments before the final song or prayer – not to upstage Everett. While it’s likely people anticipated more than the two or three minutes it would have taken for him to deliver what became known as his “Gettysburg Address,” they certainly weren’t expecting anything particularly extensive either. That wasn’t why he was there.

The suggestion that he scribbled the speech on the back of an envelope on the train ride in is counter to everything else we know about Lincoln and public speaking, and is refuted by specific history regarding this particular speech as well. (Like, we have the diary entries and such of men around him who recorded things like, “Lincoln asked my thoughts on his most recent edit of his speech. I suggested he wait for a dove to attack him on the train, but he insisted on borrowing my copy of ‘Greek Funeral Orations for Dummies’ and a thesaurus, so…” )*

Lincoln at GettysburgThe ‘holy inspiration’ myth speaks more to the power and seemingly supernatural impact of the speech in retrospect than it does anything based on temporal reality. Lincoln wrote how he wrote and spoke how he spoke as a result of years of study and practice, editing and peer review. He may have been inspired, but that inspiration was manifested as part of decades of hard work to get better at it.

So, there’s a lesson.

In case you don’t still have it memorized from Middle School, it went something like this: 

Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation — or any nation so conceived and so dedicated — can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate — we can not consecrate — we can not hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here.

It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. 

It still gives me the goose shivers. Next time I’ll offer up my amateur breakdown of this classic historical ditty. I know you simply can’t wait.

Lincoln With Axe

*I’m paraphrasing 

RELATED POST: The Gettysburg Address, Part Two (Dedicated to a Proposition)

RELATED POST: The Gettysburg Address, Part Three (Lincoln’s Big ‘But’)

RELATED POST: Useful Fictions, Part I – Historical Myths

“Here’s Your Mule,” Part Seven – Grant Me This

U.S. GrantGrant was perhaps the single most bearded example of nothing working quite the way it should have during the American Civil War. He’d have never ended up a war hero, let alone future President, in a more ordered universe. I’m not sure he’d have existed at all. 

He did, however – and oh the shenanigans.  

U.S. Grant Younger

Born “Hiram Ulysses Grant,” he became “Ulysses S. Grant” through a paperwork error when admitted to West Point at age 17 (never let it be said the federal government places a priority on accuracy). This would later come in handy as he entered national consciousness for his accomplishments on the battlefield, as the new moniker lent itself to such natural wordplay:  “U.S.” Grant, “Uncle Sam” Grant, and eventually “Unconditional Surrender” Grant… but I’m getting ahead of myself. 

He didn’t initially care much for the militant life, and his grades reflected such. Still, he did well in the subjects he liked. He was strong in math, excelled in horsemanship, and he… um… painted. Not, like, battle scenes or modern art or something – “pretty” stuff. It was the ‘Romantic Era’, after all. 

Grant Paintings

A reasonable universe would never send this boy to war. Instead, he’d be running the Artistic Equestrian Ranch or some other utopian-ish community where people get in touch with their inner alcoholic and work the steps through painting and pony-play. 

Oh – because that was the other thing. Grant was often accused of being quite the drinker.

To be thought of as having a ‘drinking problem’ by the standards of the day required an insane amount of imbibery. Americans were serious drinkers by ANY definition. Imagine calling out a teenager today for having a ‘social media and reality TV’ problem compared to his or her peers. My god – how bad would it have to be…?

Mrs. Winslow's Soothing Syrup

Then again, maybe it wasn’t true. Grant didn’t like most people and didn’t make much effort to be popular. This probably didn’t help when it came to his reputation or his business dealings, both during and after the Mexican-American War. He served quite effectively, but resigned while stationed waaaayyyyyyyy over in California – most likely under pressure over the drinking thing. And, being himself, he lacked the funds to get back to St. Louis. 

Fortunately, a good friend serving with him, one Simon Bolivar Buckner, proffered a personal loan so that Grant could return to his hearth and kin.

CW Volunteer PosterAfter several years of failed businesses and rocky times, opportunity struck when the Civil War erupted. He helped recruit and train volunteers in Illinois, but what he really wanted was a position in the “real” army. McClellan turned him down due to his reputation for drinking, which will prove ironic a few years later when Lincoln suggests someone find out WHAT Grant was drinking – and send it to the rest of his generals so they’d fight like he did. 

Lincoln was a bit of a card that way.

Eventually Grant ends up in the Western Theater of the war (which at the time meant the vicinity of the Mississippi River). He was beginning to be noticed, particularly for his willingness to fight. Others (most notably McClellan in the East) would equivocate, fight only when unavoidable, and withdraw too easily – after wins OR losses. It could be frustrating for those who hoped the war would maybe, like, END someday, or that maybe we’d even WIN at some point. 

Grant, though, was a bulldog – he didn’t seek war, but if we’re gonna war, let’s WAR.

Ft. HenryHe ended up leading a little campaign to take Ft. Henry along the Tennessee River, which connected to the Mississippi and ran near or through about 43 different states in play during the war. It became a fun little experiment in geography, strategy, and the pre-cell phone zaniness of coordinating land forces and ‘ironclads’ – experimental watercraft made of wood but clad in, well – iron. 

The thing with boats was, you could make them float, or you could make them strong – but doing both at the same time was tricky. It must have been comical watching them in action, trying to maneuver, and fire at stuff from the water – if it weren’t for all the sinking and loudness and dying, I mean.

In any case, through an impressive combination of strategy and grit, he forced the fort’s surrender. 

As Henry falls, Grant does something unusual for a Union General at the time but which it never would have occurred to him NOT to do – he rushes 12 miles east with his army and takes Ft. Donelson as well. 

Of course. Because… war. 

Ft. Henry / Ft. Donelson Maps

Ft. DonelsonIt’s at Ft. Donelson that U.S. Grant first makes the history books.  After various military maneuvering of the sort some people seem to enjoy reading about in great detail, Grant had the Confederates in a world of hurt. 

Early morning, February 16th, the leader of Secesh forces there sent a very civil note to Grant requesting a meeting to discuss terms of surrender. War was SO polite back then, with social graces and compliments and people getting to keep their fancy guns and such. This particular leader was confident Grant would be gracious, both as a matter of course, and because the last time they’d been face to face, he’d loaned him bus fare back to St. Louis. 

The guy fighting for the wrong side at Ft. Donelson was Simon Bolivar Buckner. 

Grant’s response has become legendary:

Sir: Yours of this date proposing Armistice, and appointment of Commissioners, to settle terms of Capitulation is just received. No terms except unconditional and immediate surrender can be accepted.

I propose to move immediately upon your works.

I am, sir, very respectfully, your obedient servant,

U.S. GRANT,

Brigadier-General, Commanding. 

It wasn’t personal – they were in rebellion against the very nation Grant was sworn to serve. Buckner had little choice but to comply. 

SIR:—The distribution of the forces under my command, incident to an unexpected change of commanders, and the overwhelming force under your command, compel me, notwithstanding the brilliant success of the Confederate arms yesterday, to accept the ungenerous and unchivalrous terms which you propose.

I am, sir, your very obedient servant,

S. B. BUCKNER,

Brigadier. General, C. S. Army.

Did you notice he left out the ‘respectfully’ part of the froo-froo sig? And you gotta love Buckner’s defense of his Confederate peeps even as he becomes the first Confederate General to surrender anything important during this war – “unless my superiors show up unexpectedly, and keeping in mind that we beat you in EVERY STAT EXCEPT SCORING, I guess I have to accept your terms, despite you being a bit of a dillweed about it.” 

I Propose To Move Immediately Upon Your Works

Once that bit of unpleasantness was concluded, Grant was thoroughly gracious to Buckner and his staff. He offered him funds to help tie him over while he was a prisoner of war, and suggesting Buckner could grab a few personal items if he wished before they confiscated all of their equipment and such. 

Buckner declined.

Northern newspapers reported both the military success and the exchange of notes with unrestrained glee. Hiram Ulysses was thereafter “Unconditional Surrender” Grant and the North finally had a win, and a hero with a catchy nickname to go with it. Had West Point gotten his name right to begin with, they’d have had only the initials ‘H.U.G’ to work with, and that would have just been awkward.  

Different Strokes“I propose to move immediately upon your works” became a catchphrase throughout the North for almost any situation. Those of you who endured the decades of “Where’s the Beef?” or “Whatchu talking’ bout, Willis?” know how these things can go. Then again, this one grew organically – not as a result of marketing or even intent – so perhaps bringing up Different Strokes is a bit too harsh.

Besides, because people back home were by definition not AT war, it was most often used in other contexts – the best of which were completely inappropriate.

“Oh, Robert, you do know how to flatter and fluster a girl.”  *fan* *fan* *fan* *fan* “It’s growing late, Robert… I should be getting back before they realize I’m not- Robert! Whatever are you-?”

“Louise, I propose to move immediately upon your works.”

Unconditional Surrender To Love

I don’t actually know how successful this line proved as a general rule, but it amuses me to no end. It could be used much more harshly or far more humorously, but as a “just the right amount of naughty” come-on, it’s golden. 

There’s probably a pretty strong case to be made that equating of military violence with sexual conquest has a negative side to it as well, but that’s for another day and another blog. As a straight white male whose sense of humor is stuck in middle school, it’s right up there with a good Canterbury fart joke or Ben Franklin arguing the merits of seducing older women. 

Clearly the best, undiscovered sobriquet for our favorite general has to be “Usurpingly Sexy” Grant. He can move on my works any time. 

Here's Your Mule

RELATED POST: “Here’s Your Mule,” Part One – North vs. South

RELATED POST: “Here’s Your Mule,” Part Two – Slavery & Sinners

RELATED POST: “Here’s Your Mule,” Part Three – That Sure Was Sumter

RELATED POST: “Here’s Your Mule,” Part Four – On To Richmond!

RELATED POST: “Here’s Your Mule,” Part Five – Bull Run Goes South

RELATED POST: “Here’s Your Mule,” Part Six – Soiled Armor

Defining Success (An #OklaEd Challenge)

Dr XIt’s so teacher of us – a variety of challenges complete with topics and word limits have been issued to various #oklaed bloggers lately, some with DUE DATES! In other words, we’re giving each other actual assignments.

And responding, more often than not. Go figure.

All across Oklahoma, computer screens are being damaged by red pens as we forget ourselves and begin trying to mark them up before assigning grades. I’m not entirely sure if they meet whatever our state standards are this week, but I’m pretty sure OkEducationTruths in particular has remained 100% Common Core compliant throughout – so… kudos, Rick!

Rather than becoming a limitation, it’s actually quite freeing to be ‘assigned’ a topic and such. No second-guessing whether you’ve chosen the right subject matter, written too much or too little, etc. As an otherwise mess of a student told me my very first year teaching when I clearly had no idea what I was expecting on a project I’d assigned, “Sometimes fences set us free.”

Scott Haselwood of Teaching From Here recently prompted Erin Barnes of Educating Me to blog her definition of success. She did – and I was personally blown away.

That Haselwood is a slippery ol’ boy, though (he’s, um… he’s one of those ‘math’ types). When he noticed my praise of Erin’s post, this happened:

Tweet One - Haselwood Challenge

Tweet 2 - My Response One

Tweet 3 - My Response Two

I wasn’t just being gracious about not being able to top it. It’s pretty good. Rather than try to match it on my own, I’ll do what I do in class and borrow the wisdom of others – my role being mere commentary. Because this is a blog post and I want lots of hits, I’ll also cram it into a ‘list’ format. Talk about ‘success’ – I’ll be selling ad space in no time!

(1) Success is not making things worse. This probably sounds rather negative. Perhaps it is. The thing is, we’re all so broken and careless and it’s so hard to see clearly – we wound one another constantly, in such colorful variations – commission, ommission, misunderstanding, hurt, anger, fear… success is when we don’t. Or at least when we manage to do it less.

Broken China People

I’m not being entirely fair – not all of you are such a mess. Some of you manage to come out on the positive side more days than not, and I’m deeply thankful for the truly complete souls in my world who pour in more than they drain out. More power to you, and thanks for not being dillweeds about it most of the time.

For the rest of us, before we can encourage, inspire, challenge, or otherwise build up those in our reach, first we must take our cue from Hippocrates and ‘do no harm.’

…They walked carefully through the china country. The little animals and all the people scampered out of their way, fearing the strangers would break them, and after an hour or so the travelers reached the other side of the country and came to another china wall… by standing upon the Lion’s back they all managed to scramble to the top. Then the Lion gathered his legs under him and jumped on the wall; but just as he jumped, he upset a china church with his tail and smashed it all to pieces.

“That was too bad,” said Dorothy, “but really I think we were lucky in not doing these little people more harm than breaking a cow’s leg and a church. They are all so brittle!” 

Broken Figurine“They are, indeed,” said the Scarecrow, “and I am thankful I am made of straw and cannot be easily damaged. There are worse things in the world than being a Scarecrow.”

(The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, Chapter 20)

We remember they killed the witches, but forget they took the Wizard away from a perfectly contented Emerald City before proceeding to stomp through the little china people. To their credit, they tried – but Dorothy arrived in a tornado and never really outgrew that quirk until back home and properly restrained.

(2) Success is paying attention.

Doctor, my eyes have seen the years, and the slow parade of fears without crying – now I want to understand. 

I have done all that I could to see the evil and the good without hiding; you must help me if you can.

Doctor, my eyes… tell me what is wrong. Was I unwise to leave them open for so long?

(Jackson Browne, 1972)

Eyes OpenI think the hardest thing about teaching, about marriage, about parenting, about citizenship, about socializing, cooking, fixing, feeling, running, thinking, being – is paying attention.

Always.

What’s being said, and by whom? How do they feel? What do they mean? What’s the big picture, and what really matters in this situation? What are my options – my real options?

We are creatures of habit and selective attention – a necessary development to function in a complicated and highly stimulating world. But to listen, and see, and think, and feel – that’s challenging. Somehow, though, everything important comes from there.

(3) Success is to just keep going.

You’ve probably picked up on what a downer this list seems to be. That’s not really my intent – I’m a idealist at heart. Sort of. Some days. Well… that one time.

Regret StormtrooperI’ve taught some great lessons in my time, and watched some young people have some pretty impressive lightbulb moments. Not every day, though – not most days, or most kids, or most lessons. Sometimes I really step in it, saying or doing something reckless and unnecessary – which, I mean, is the same reason the good stuff works. But sometimes it doesn’t, and I hurt someone, one of my kids, or peers, or worse – I alienate them. Lose them for the light.

Other times it’s less serious – blog posts that suck, or which leave me feeling exposed in the icy silence of cyberspace (you want to crush an online voice, don’t argue or attack – just ignore. I assure you, it’s devastating.) Side projects that don’t take, or conference proposals that go nowhere, or worse – bring in two people for the day to awkwardly stumble along with me.

Sometimes it’s a marriage, or that kid you tried to raise better, or that job you lost, or that purchase you should/shoudn’t have made. That accident, that embarrassment, that stupid stupid thing you said. That emptiness you caused, or felt, or filled with all the wrong things. That sickness. That inadequacy.

We grossly underestimate the value and power of simply getting up again the next day and trying to press through one more time. You juggle, you adjust, you ponder, or sometimes you just put your head down and charge. Maybe you get closer, maybe you don’t – but, see… that’s OK. Because you’re still going.

And when you just keep going, sometimes you say the right thing at the right time in the right way. When you just keep going, sometimes you’re the one who helps someone back up, or sits with them while they can’t. When you just keep going, you sometimes get it right. You sometimes figure stuff out. You occasionally get better in one or two areas.

If you haven’t yet, then you start now. As long as you’re still going, it’s not failure. You haven’t quit.

And that makes it success.

Dancing Fools

RELATED POST: Absolution (Bring Me My Crosier)

RELATED POST: My 300 Epiphany

RELATED POST: Happy New Mirrors!