A Public Thank You To OK Legislators

Awkward HugI’d like to thank the Oklahoma State Legislature for approving the use of $51 million from the state’s “Rainy Day Fund” in order to soften the blow taken by public education this year.

I’ve been very critical of this legislature for their handling of our state budget over the past several years. I’m still opposed to the extent of the tax cuts they’ve approved, and there are some in leadership I’m convinced are willfully and maliciously dismembering public education at the bidding of their fiscal overlords from other realms.

But I’m not talking about them right now. 

Thanks to the rest of you for softening your stance enough to recognize that public education and other essentials of the social contract have been demonized and attacked by those elected to implement and support them, and for doing what you could to provide airbags for our crash landing. 

Thanks to those of you who’ve advocated for public education throughout your time in office, often at the expense of having your other issues taken seriously or your legislation heard because you weren’t “playing ball” with those sitting at the biggest desks. We recognize that in speaking truth to power, you’ve crippled your own ability to implement change – a paradox I couldn’t navigate so gracefully.

A special thanks to those of you who’ve been fighting these extreme tax policies for years, and who years ago publicly predicted the situation we’re now in. We don’t always acknowledge or appreciate you, despite what should be a natural alliance of “Davids” in a system controlled by “Goliaths”. 

Thank you to the members of the Education Committees in both the House and Senate who opposed even bringing voucher bills to the floors of their respective houses. I know you took substantial heat from leadership and I want to publicly acknowledge that you voted your conscience and what you believed your constituents wanted despite the political costs, and despite not immediately having the numbers to prevail. 

Thank you to the many legislators in both houses who worked behind the scenes to prevent these bills from coming to the floor. It’s difficult to express this with any specificity, because unless you’ve communicated your convictions publicly, we don’t know who you are

Even if we did, I’m not sure I’d be doing you any favors by listing your names. I recognize that you’re now targeted by state leadership for doing what was right for the marginalized and underserved across our state, and a Blue Cereal endorsement wouldn’t exactly improve your status in their eyes.

Otherwise I’d send you a mug or something. I know, I know… but that’s politics. 

Thank you to the many Republicans in both houses who refuse to accept that their party must stand only for the elite and the chosen few, and who’ve endured a “calling out” by the Governor’s office as closet Democrats – as if concern for your constituents or the children of this state is a character flaw and the defining element of Republicanism is not a passion for America’s potential or a belief in self-reliance, but mindless obedience to one’s fiscal overlords. Thank you for believing that your party can stand for more than some malevolent caricature, even when it costs you influence and support – and may cost you your office.

Thank you to the Democrats in both houses for providing the kind of minority opposition essential to meaningful democracy and thoughtful decision-making. Your role is critical even when final decisions aren’t as “thoughtful” as our system intends. 

Thank you for those behind-closed-doors efforts to kill hundreds of horrible ideas before they reached the floor. A few got through – and we’re dealing with those – but most of it went away. While I’m not privy to details, thank you to those of you who made that happen.

Thank you Superintendent Joy Hofmeister for calling on me during Q&A even though you know you’ll regret it every time. You’ve been pretty tight-lipped about your role in all of this over the past month, but I suspect you’re a big part of whatever damage control was managed this time around. 

I suspect your relative silence is pragmatism allowing you to be more effective rather than maneuvering allowing you to advance your political future. Thank you for choosing the right thing over the ambitious thing, whether we see it clearly just yet or not.

I don’t speak for all of #OklaEd – only the wisest and best-looking among them – but I hereby commit myself to do everything in my humble power to promote the re-election of sitting legislators who chose to shield public education from at least some of the blast this time around. 

I don’t agree with all of you about everything, and given a little face-to-face time and a drink or three, I’d argue that few of us are completely guiltless in this mess. But we choose our representatives from those who run, and we work with those actually able to get elected in Oklahoma – and that means a few compromises and reality checks here and there. 

I resolve to do my best to get every teacher or parent who called or emailed or shared FB posts cursing you for this session’s insanity to follow up by voting their voice in June, and August, and November. I know that all of our talk about you “working for us” only matters if we play our role as well and make sure the good ones stay in office and the bad ones are replaced. 

I’m officially calling on all #11FF and the entirety of #OklaEd to reach out to at least a half-dozen co-workers, neighbors, folks at church, parents of students, etc., and encourage them to get informed and get involved. 

Yes, we’ll keep calling and emailing and carrying on about legislation still on the table, but let’s do so in informed, targeted ways. Let’s put the same effort into thanking and supporting those fighting FOR us as we’re putting into calling out those AGAINST us. 

Finally, I’d like to encourage those of us NOT in office, but still fighting FOR public ed, to resist the temptation to turn on one another over details, or to let legitimate disagreements fragment our collective voice. I’d remind myself as much as anyone else that private schools and their teachers, parents, and students are NOT the enemy, nor are those trying to serve kids through charters, TFA, homeschooling, or whatever. 

Our fight is with corporate exploitation and manipulation of the weak; not with individuals trying to educate kids in a different way than ourselves. I’ve been guilty of forgetting this distinction too many times to take it lightly now. 

As educators, we pride ourselves on looking past clichés and stereotypes, or even the facades willfully projected by our students, in order to find the “real child” and the potential underneath. Thank you for doing the same for us and for our kids. We are resolved to do a better job of doing the same for you, starting now. 

Let us know how we can help.

Welcome to Atheist School!

Atheist SchoolThere’s been an interesting exchange making the rounds on Facebook the past few days, and I contacted the original author for permission to share it. The decision to change the name to ‘B.C.’ was mine, and based only on the venom being slung towards #OklaEd bloggers lately. (I’d hate for Jay to go after her family and kids without at least going to the trouble to hunt down the original all by his shocked-and-outraged-little-self.) 

It begins simply enough…

From: B.C. 

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 3:18 PM

To: Travis Dunlap

Subject: HB2949

Representative Dunlap,

As a parent with children in Bartlesville Public Schools I am very concerned by HB 2949. If this bill passes it would result in a $2.2 million dollar hit to BPS. Please vote NO to school vouchers and HB2949.

Thank you,

B.C.

Bartlesville, OK

Travis DunlapElected representatives don’t get anonymity. That’s not how being in elected office works. 

On Feb 24, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Travis Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:

Thank you for writing B.C.,

I really appreciate hearing from constituents (especially parents!). I would like to provide you with my personal cell phone to be stored in your contacts for use at your discretion. My cell phone number is (xxx) xxx-xxxx.

To his credit, he shared his actual number. You want it, YOU email him and ask for it. 

I want to quickly note that the figure you reference is based on an assumption of over 100,000 students participating and taking an unspecified categorization of the ESA funding formula (there are three categorizations: 10%, 60% and 90% of what is spent on the student in a public state using the state aid formula). The estimate also assumes that revenues stay the same over a 14 year period.

A 2.2 million dollar hit for BPS in next year’s budget is simply not a reality in this bill.

Sincerely,

Travis Dunlap

Fair enough, so far. Numbers and impact and such are always subject to dispute. Plus, he sounds all… facty and stuff. That’s kinda rare ‘round these parts – so kudos to Mr. Dunlap on THAT, even if he’s partly just spewing party-talking-point babble.

From: B.C. 

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 11:22 AM

To: Travis Dunlap

Subject: Re: HB2949

God MoneyThank you for getting back with me on this topic. The more I research this bill and read what it allows the more I dislike it. The main issue is the hit, of any size, that our public schools would take. I do not think my public tax dollars should be used to fund private institutions. There is not enough accountability within private schools.

I also do not think that my tax dollars should go towards funding the religious education of others. Many private schools are religious in nature and I am not supportive of my tax dollars being used to further their religious agendas. How would you feel if part of your paycheck was taken and used to send kids to an atheist based private school? Are you OK with your money being spent to teach kids that God doesn’t exist? How about a Muslim school? Would you be OK with your money funding tuition for kids to attend a school and read and study the Koran?

As a former Catholic school student I know how much religion is worked into the curriculum. I am Methodist. I am pro-choice. I truly believe that we should love everyone no matter what their sexual orientation. I do not want my money going to a school that tells young women they cannot make decisions for their own health and well-being. I do not want my money going to a school that teaches that some people are better than others and should have more rights than others based on their sexual orientation. Can you guarantee me that my tax dollars will not be supporting religious schools that teach children views that are opposite to what I believe? If you cannot, then this bill forces me to write a blank check to institutions that I fundamentally disagree with.

This bill is welfare for private schools at the expense of our public school systems. If parents want their kids to attend private schools, whether it is for religious or academic or any other reason, they should pay for it themselves. I should not have to foot the bill, especially when it takes money away from the schools my own children attend.

Thank you ,

B.C.

 So… our friend B.C. got a bit more detailed on this one. VERY well-spoken!

 Here’s where it gets interesting, if not exactly surprising…

Witch SchoolFrom: Travis Dunlap <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: HB2949

Date: February 24, 2016 at 1:26:56 PM CST

To: B.C.

Hello again,

You communicate all of this very well. Thank you for your dialogue. I only want to point out that I hear many parents who choose alternative education express the same frustration when they see what their tax dollars support at public school (which are atheist-based). I believe we will continue to serve widening range of student needs in our public education. ESA’s are the best way to serve the public as a whole. They have typically increased quality at all education institutions when they have been implemented in other states.

Look at the research referenced at edchoice.org for an introduction to this kind of material.

Thank you once again for your dialogue. It has been very kind.

Sincerely,

Travis Dunlap

Wow.

“Atheist-based”?

It grabs you enough that you might easily miss the nonsense about vouchers improving school quality in other states. I also liked the slightly patronizing tone of “go look at this neat site to get started with knowing what you’re talking about!” It’s so… Amway

Bit I digress.

“Atheist-based”?

Now, it’s entirely possible that Mr. Dunlap simply doesn’t know the difference between non-sectarian, secular, and outright atheist. I’ve often run into these dilemmas when dealing with state legislators – are they boldly and cynically lying, or genuinely that clueless about the issues over which they hold such power and authority?

I try to find third options – I really do – but so far they’ve eluded me. 

Sen. BrecheenEither way, Representative Dunlap is expressing a mindset quite common among state leadership. We heard it in Sen. Brecheen’s rants over Common Core and our failure to enforce Old Testament law across the state (he wanted supporters chased down with swords, if memory serves). We saw it in Rep. Fisher’s demands that history be sanitized and Xianized or they’d yank AP funding, and we felt it in his shock and hurt when his efforts fell short because – in his words – they’d been misrepresented as a threat to *sniff* yank *gurgle* AP *sob* funding!

Damn #OklaEd bloggers and their socialist grawlixes! 

Senators Bennett and Dahm and others annually submit legislation to push their version of Xianity into more of the school day, and when in January we begin rounding up Muslims and placing them in internment camps (no doubt with names like “Religious Freedom Expansion Retreats”), it will bring nothing but joy to Republican leadership and their ilk. 

But back to those “atheist-based” schools and the huge danger they seem to pose. 

It’s been awhile since I’ve been a committed evangelical, but I don’t recall Biblical Christianity being so fragile.

The constant terror that the One True Faith will be subverted and destroyed by a little high school science, or where we place the Ten Commandments, or moments of introspection regarding our historical sins and national shortcomings – it’s like they have Jesus confused with Tinkerbell, and must devote all their legislative energies to demanding we clap harder and faster before she’s lost forever!

Pouting TinkerbellThe proverbial “wall of separation” may serve to protect people from religion. In modern usage, it often serves to protect non-majority faiths from government restriction or public abuse. But they’re not the groups with the MOST to lose when the state takes on a new and improved role as Higher Truth Police. 

The worst thing you can do to Christianity isn’t to ban it, or fight it, or mock it, or persecute it. Surely they’ve read enough of their Bibles and know a FEW of the many historical examples of REAL faith flourishing under the worst possible conditions. 

The worst thing you can do to Christianity is legislate it – to finance it when it does what you want, and defund it when it doesn’t. The worst thing you can do is wrap it up with politics and money and the power of the state polluting and obscuring the Still Small Voice of personal communication with the Eternal. Ask Catholics in the Middle Ages, or Puritans in colonial times, or anyone living under truly radical Islam today.

I don’t teach at an atheistic school, Mr. Dunlap, and I’m not trying to protect my kids from religion – yours, their parents’, or anyone else’s.

I’m trying to protect them – and their journeys of faith, whatever form they may take – from you and your ilk.

No wonder they hate us. 

[[{“type”:”media”,”view_mode”:”media_small”,”fid”:”1859″,”attributes”:{“alt”:””,”class”:”media-image”,”typeof”:”foaf:Image”}}]]

RELATED POST: The Blaine Game, Part One (Information)

RELATED ARTICLE: Official’s Email Creates Dispute (from the Bartlesville Examiner-Enterprise)

RELATED POST: On Instilling Humanity (from This Teacher Sings)

RELATED INFORMATION: Vouchers / ESAs

Let’s Talk About Choice

Confusing SignThere’s been a real emphasis recently on parent choice in regard to public schooling. Apparently, parents know better than anyone what’s best for their child and what sort of education is most appropriate for their individual needs.

Of the many pro-voucher arguments out there, this seems to be the one state leadership has decided on as their primary talking point. I must confess, I’m a bit bewildered when they became such fans.

When parents began opting out of standardized testing because they didn’t think it was best for their children, state leaders didn’t seem too excited about parent choice. Many were annoyed, others apathetic. The overall tone seemed to indicate that these stupid parents were just causing trouble – probably because they’d been led astray by radical bloggers and corrupt superintendents. I certainly don’t recall many legislators applauding for these wise parents and their use of choice.

When parents protested that their third grade children were being brutalized by high-stakes reading tests, facing retention and large scarlet ‘F’s on their chests as a result, state leaders absolutely loathed parent choice. A feisty group of elected representatives finally managed to change the rules enough that parents at least have SOME voice in whether it would be ‘best for their child’ to move on to fourth grade, and Governor Fallin VETOED it – because what do parents know about standards and accountability and children? 

The veto was overridden, but at the cost of a ‘sunset provision’ on parental involvement – meaning the same people crying for ‘parent choice’ for their chosen sliver of the population are still itching to eliminate it for the rest. 

My son would have benefited greatly from getting out of the six-hour day, the old-school academic core-you-to-death structure in which he was bound, but state law said no. Every child, regardless of ability, interest, background, or potential, has to have X-number of required butt-in-seat hours and be crammed full of the same tired basics that state leadership has mandated as sacred and holy for all kids, for all time. 

I wanted desperately to give him something more practical, outdoors, or vo-tech heavy MUCH earlier in his schooling, but I didn’t have that choice. NO parent has that choice. The state knows what’s best, and we don’t – that’s why they make the laws and set the harsh penalties if I don’t force my kid through them, no matter how bad for him or her it might be. 

The anti-vaxxers have gained a little leeway in Oklahoma, but by and large have very little choice whether or not their child will be immunized before heading off to school. Why don’t we give these parents choice? Freedom to do what’s best for their kids, who might have different needs?

Seat-belt laws are about as anti-choice as it gets. They are the ultimate statement of belief that too many parents don’t have the first god-given CLUE what’s best for their kids. They’re too stupid to even buckle them in without the threat of fiscal penalty. Parent choice? Are you kidding? 

I hesitate to even bring up the demonization of smokers – tell THOSE parents they have the right to decide what’s best for their kids or their community when they light up. You’ll get either a sardonic chuckle or a pop in the nose for being a smart-ass. (Sorry to blur that there issue, Jay.

Nor do they have much real choice what their kids are allowed to eat at school. The state mandates the most awful fat-free gluten-free flavor-free color-free slop, boosting the sales of Flamin’ Hot Cheetos far above anything legislation could have mandated had they so desired. Sure, you can send lunch with them, as long as you have the sort of lifestyle allowing you to pack it each morning, and as long as it doesn’t have to be hot, or cold, or mixed, or preserved in any way throughout the day.

Even PTSA Pizza Day now means special everything-free crust and no toppings of any kind because Michelle Obama and Jason Nelson think kids are fat. None of this screams parent choice (although it’s a wonderful example of unintended consequences – the kids eat far worse than they did before because we’ve made the standard options so unpalatable). 

Spanking my child is only a choice if I keep it a dirty little secret. 

Deciding that my 8-year old or sleeping infant is fine in the car for five minutes on a nice day with the doors locked but windows cracked while I run into CVS to grab their prescription isn’t parent choice anymore – it’s a call to the police and DHS. 

Same for sending them to play in the park across the street without Zuckerberg-level security. I know it’s safe, the neighborhood knows it’s safe, all available statistics say it’s safe, but the need for us to remain in perpetual panic and fear so as to be more easily controlled says parents simply don’t GET that kind of CHOICE.

What’s left?

Oh, yes – the vouchers. 

IF I’m an involved enough parent to understand the process and go through the paperwork, and IF I can afford the thousands of extra out-of-pocket dollars required to actually GO to a private school, vouchers or no, and IF my child can meet the requirements of the institutions at which these ESA Gift-Cards are useable, and IF I have the time and fiscal resources to get them there and back every day, and IF I can pay for any necessary materials, supplies, instruments, uniforms, or whatever else may be required, and IF my child is a perfect fit academically and, er… “culturally” with the school, THEN I have CHOICE.

Equity and access on paper while upper class white folks are the only ones with real options in practice? Shocking. What a strange new problem to encounter. 

As a bonus, the more times “choice” is bandied about in the rhetoric, the easier it is to “blame the victim” when they don’t qualify to be “choosers.” 

Once again we have edu-slation claiming to serve all the little children, when the only thing it’s really designed to serve is more state-sanctioned ‘white flight’. That sort of misdirection and shameless hypocrisy is why so many of us seem to be in a perpetual snit. We’re trying to wake up Citizen Doe before the fire reaches her bedroom, but she’s fast asleep dreaming of the Gay Muslims trying to take her guns from the bathroom stall next door. 

If common education weren’t being methodically dismantled to begin with, I wouldn’t personally be fussing nearly as much as my smarter, better-looking peers in #OklaEd. You wanna cull the supposed cream and hide them away at Word of Faith of Hope of Grace until they’re old enough to join Hydra leadership? Live it up. It’s still wrong, and it’s not good for either group of children, but whatever. 

I don’t mind choice as such. But if we feel the slightest obligation to mean anything we say in the political realm anymore, and choice is your thing, then let’s provide choices – lots of them – to ALL parents, and ALL kids, in both public and private scenarios. Let’s set loose that “free market of ideas” of which conservatives used to be so proud, and support it until the playing field at least looks level – even if it means risking possible success by a few kids NOT on our ‘chosen’ list. 

RELATED POSTS: The Voucher Opportunity / Hair of the Blog (OKEducationTruths)

RELATED POSTS: #OklaEd Legislators are Sweet on ESA’s / Who’s Standing In The Dark? (A View From The Edge)

RELATED POSTS: 10th Amendment & #OklaEd / Do ESAs Pass the Lemon Test? (Idealistically Realistic)

Blue Serials (2/22/16) #OKElections16 Special Edition

White Rabbit

February is a Hectic Time in the World of Edu-slation.

There are deadlines to be met in getting bills heard in committee, and variations on several themes are simultaneously being bounced around in the State House and the State Senate. 

Parents are calling and emailing, bloggers are bullying and grawlixing, and even the legit news sites are scrambling to keep up with the madness. 

For those of you not fully immersed in the more fussified issues of the day, I’ve been maintaining an easy-to-use guide of sorts on the #OKElections16 section of this website. I thought it might be helpful TODAY, however, to boil even THAT down to a few highlights on some of the major issues in #OklaEd this week. Maybe you’ve heard them discussed, perhaps even offered opinions of your own, but deep down inside you know you haven’t had the time to actually, um… research. 

That’s OK. I’m here for you. There, there… let it all out. I’ve got you. All better?

Mad Hatter Tea Party

ESAs / Vouchers:

Tulsa World Editorial: Lindsey Nicole Henry Scholarship program is constitutional, and still a bad idea – The Tulsa World (2/17/16) – If you don’t subscribe to the Tulsa World, you’re doing EVERYTHING wrong. No offense. 

A Week of Gains for School Choice Efforts – Nate Robson and Jennifer Palmer, Oklahoma Watch (2/16/16) – So… good times, eh?

Do ESAs Pass The Lemon Test? – David Burton, Idealistically Realistic (2/14/16) – Let’s talk constitutionality, especially since fighting so many losing causes is expensive – and apparently we’re broke. 

HB2949 and John Green – Claudia Swisher, Fourth Generation Teacher (2/14/16) – Who, exactly, is public education FOR?

The Blaine Game, Part One (Information) – Blue Cereal Education (2/6/16) – This one’s me, but GOLLY my stuff is THAT GOOD!

Top 10 Reasons School Choice is No Choice – Steven Singer, GadflyOnTheWallBlog (1/27/16) – And right in the middle of ‘Celebrate School Choice Week’! Singer’s not #oklaed, but he’s dead on with this one and it applies x1000 here. 

A Call To Arms – A View From The Edge (12/1/15) – A look at the rhetorical shenanigans surrounding ESAs/Vouchers

Chesire Legislator

Funding Education in Oklahoma

The Facts About Oklahoma Education – Oklahoma Education Coalition

As Legislators Weigh School Cuts, a Rising Outcry From Parents and Advocates – Jennifer Palmer and Nate Robson, Oklahoma Watch (2/19/16) – Turns out even in Oklahoma, people get touchy when they figure out you’re trying to screw over their kids even more.

James Frasier: Government cowardice to blame for Oklahoma’s mess – James Frasier, Guest Editorial in The Tulsa World (2/17/16)

10th Amendment & #OklaEd – David Burton, Idealistically Realistic (2/11/16) – With States’ Rights comes States’ Responsibilities… this is one of my favorite posts EVER on the subject of state government and public education.

Cut The Crap, Not The Budget – OKEducationTruths (12/17/15) – Education $$, State Tax Policy, and don’t piss down my back and tell me it’s raining. 

Alice Croquet

General Budget Shenanigans:

Sales Tax Exemptions: A Puzzling Roster of Haves and Have-Nots – Warren Vieth, Oklahoma Watch (2/18/16) – The good news is, it’s not just Oil & Gas Bigwigs being catered to by state legislators. Or is that the bad news?

The tax shift rears its head – Gene Perry, Oklahoma Policy Institute (2/16/16) – When tax cuts for the rich don’t work, cut taxes for the rich MORE and go after the poor. What could possibly go wrong?

Thousands of Oklahoma state employees given raises despite budget woes – Randy Ellis, The Oklahoman (2/7/16) – This was the trigger to my complete and total meltdown later that day. 

Budget Trends and Outlook – January 2016 – Oklahoma Policy Institute (1/19/16) – Clear facts and visual aids about budget decisions in OK over the past five years. And I love good visual aids. 

The Oklahoma Budget Crisis Hasn’t Hurt Everyone – Rob Miller, A View From The Edge (1/10/16) – Funny how the same guy assuring us that brutal cuts are a great “opportunity” keeps getting substantial raises every year. Why can’t he have some “opportunity” as well?

Tweedle Dum & Tweedle Dummer

Keep yourself informed and STAY INVOLVED.

All that stuff about your voice making a difference may or may not have a basis in reality when it comes to national elections or whether or not your wife can raise those kids however she pleases, but it DOES have impact in state and local politics. Remember – be polite, be informed, be concise, and move on. 

Check my brilliant Candidate Profiles to see if your Representative or Senator has been profiled, and know who your people are and how they’re voting. You don’t have to agree with me about everything, but if you don’t agree with me about most things, you’re probably wrong.

Bless you, my #11FF – Keep Being Amazing. You are more necessary than you’ll ever know to those you’d least expect. 

The Blaine Game (Updated)

Treehouse

Way back in 1875, President Ulysses S. Grant called for a Constitutional amendment that would mandate free public schools and prohibit the use of public money for “sectarian” purposes. 

The idea of free public schools wasn’t new, but neither was it universal. And it wasn’t unheard of for various state governments to support education provided through religious institutions. It was working, and seemed practical at one time, so why not?

Republican Congressman James G. Blaine was happy to comply and proposed such an amendment. It came close to passage, but fell just short and never became law. 

Over time, however, various Supreme Court rulings essentially codified the same principle. It’s a tricky balance sometimes (should states help Catholic schools buy Algebra textbooks?), but generally the separation between church and state is assumed in most circumstances – including school funding. 

Most states – including Oklahoma – were less ambivalent, and have language similar to Blaine’s original proposal in their state constitutions, often informally referenced as ‘the Blaine Amendment’. For example, Article 2, Section 5 of Oklahoma’s constitution says this:

No public money or property shall ever be appropriated, applied, donated, or used, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, or system of religion, or for the use, benefit, or support of any priest, preacher, minister, or other religious teacher or dignitary, or sectarian institution as such.

That language, along with Supreme Court’s interpretation of the First Amendment over the years, is why we can’t have a 10 Commandments monument on capitol grounds. It’s also why ESAs/vouchers are unconstitutional– even those currently hidden behind the shield of ‘special needs’. 

The courts haven’t agreed with me on that one yet, but that doesn’t mean I’m wrong. 

Diverse FaithsReligious diversity in the United States has expanded considerably since 1875, making the distinction between faith and politics even more appropriate. Disputes which used to involve whether or not copper buttons on your coat would cost you your eternal soul now seem quaint compared to disagreements over which god is the “real” one, or what caliber Jesus would use to eliminate children of other faiths.  

It can get personal.

For people of relatively orthodox faith in Oklahoma, this increasing diversity looks and feels very much like their fundamental beliefs and lifestyles are under some sort of attack. What used to be assumed is now suddenly controversial, and traditions which used to bind communities together are now accused of being dangerous and wrong-headed. 

Take a moment and appreciate how disturbing this is to someone not quite so detached and smugly intellectual as those on the opposite extreme. These aren’t bad people, for the most part – they’re just a little freaked out and worried about the world in which their kids are growing up.

Unfortunately, politics and pragmatism rarely allow for such reflection. Decisions must be made and funds allocated. “Blaine Amendment” or not, there are currently two pathways by which Oklahoma parents can procure state support to send their child to a private school – even a “sectarian” one.  

Philanthropy ManThe first is the “Oklahoma Equal Opportunity Education Scholarship.” This was authored by Senator Dan Newberry (R) and signed into law by Governor Fallin in 2011. 

The OEOES gives individuals and businesses a 50% tax credit for contributions made to nonprofit organizations that provide scholarships to students whose parents want them in private schools. Students must live in a district labeled ‘Yucky Doo-Doo Heads’ or worse by the state’s A-F School Shaming System (even if they’ve never actually attended public school in that district) OR live in a household “in which the total annual income during the preceding tax year does not exceed an amount equal to three hundred percent (300%) of the income standard used to qualify for a free or reduced school lunch… “

Threefold the reduced lunch threshold isn’t hardcore poverty by any stretch. This means the parents of little Theodore, who’s always gone to Word of Faith of Hope of Grace anyway, can receive financial aid from wealthy donors who will then be significantly reimbursed by taxpayer dollars. 

It’s just indirect enough to pass constitutional muster, and we could quibble over whether or not tax breaks are the same as public support. Right now, however, this is the law. 

Voucher BoyThe second is the Lindsey Nicole Henry Scholarship for Students with Disabilities, which seems to be better-known and more widely-utilized. This bill, passed in 2010, allows students who can secure the label “special needs” to take their portion of state funding and attend a private school of their parents’ choice. 

Any student with an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) who’s gone to public school in Oklahoma for at least a year OR whose parent is an active-duty member of the armed forces (often moving regularly) is eligible. Once approved, the voucher option continues through high school.

Despite pro-voucher visuals featuring a touching variety of multi-cultural children in wheelchairs and competing in the Special Olympics, it takes much less to qualify for an IEP. Any teacher can tell you the vast majority of mandated modifications are things like “allowed to use a calculator” or “sits near teacher and requires periodic redirection.” 

I’m not trivializing the role of educational modification, but we should be honest about the range of students covered by this language. 

If little Brittany’s parents can convince that 3rd Grade team that she simply MUST be given extra time on her spelling practice, or if Chauncy’s parents secure the tiniest diagnosis from their family doctor regarding his adorable 2nd Grade lisp (the kind assertively featured any time a child under the age of 20 appears in a TV commercial), they then qualify for these ‘special needs’ vouchers all the way up until their admittance letters from Stanford (Daddy’s alma mater!) 

The use of this particular ‘scholarship’ in religious schools has been validated by the courts. Several districts challenged this legislation when it first passed, and were demonized for “suing parents of handicapped kids.” The courts determined the schools lacked standing, so other approaches were tried. So far, they’ve failed. 

I’m happy enough for the parents making good use of this to get a better education for their kids. I really am. 

Private School Kids

Of greater significance, however, is the logistical reality of special needs children in MOST private schools. One of the many freedoms granted non-public institutions of learning is that they don’t have to follow IEPs or accommodations or anything else required of public schools. Ironically, an IEP may be required to GET that funding, but as soon as you’re admitted, it ceases to exist. 

While there are a handful of schools committed to better educating certain types of high-needs children – some of whom do amazing work – the vast majority are rather selective about who they do and don’t accept. Whatever their good intentions, most private schools simply lack the resources to make sure little Gertrude gets specialized attention. If she can’t step up and fit in without disrupting the flow, she’s out

Chances are she’ll never be in to begin with.

High Needs KidsFew parents of a child with substantial needs are likely to have the resources to independently fund that full-time aide to follow them from class to class, or the tutoring they’ll need to master basic math. Public schools can’t afford to do it either, but we do – because it’s the law

Public school educators arguing against vouchers (or ESAs) aren’t doing so out of some twisted venom towards religious instruction (well, some of them might be – but not the rational majority). We’re kicking and screaming because the powers-that-be are manipulating your collective sympathy and desire to do right by kids in order to redirect public funds into the pockets of their chosen favorites – many of whom are perfectly capable of funding their children’s education on their own.

We’re fussing because those who inherited the nicest treehouse keep trying to pull up the ladder so no one else can play, despite the welcome mat hanging from the highest branches and their wailing laments over the ‘choices’ of those still on the ground.

I’m not done with this issue.

RELATED POST: The Social Contract (aka “Haman’s Gallows”)

RELATED POST: Jonah’s Education