<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Meyer v. Nebraska &#8211; Blue Cereal Education</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bluecerealeducation.com/tags/meyer-v-nebraska/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bluecerealeducation.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2023 20:20:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Lochner Era &#038; &#8220;Substantive Due Process&#8221; (Part Two)</title>
		<link>https://bluecerealeducation.com/blog/lochner-era-substantive-due-process-part-two/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blue Cereal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2020 21:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allgeyer v. Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP US Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP USGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APUSH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H2H]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lochner Era]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lochner v. New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meyer v. Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierce v. Society of Sisters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/bluecerealwp/blog/lochner-era-substantive-due-process-part-two/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/sites/default/files/LochnerEraCourt.jpeg" alt="Lochner Era Court" title="Lochner Era Court" style="margin: 2px; border: 1px solid black; float: right;" width="160" height="109">“School choice” wouldn’t emerge onto the national scene until after <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em> (1954) and the various forays into moral corruption and social decay wouldn’t become staples of the nation’s highest court until a decade after that. The rest of the Lochner Era was largely about how freedom meant letting corporations do whatever they wanted to workers because those being exploited had just as much theoretical control over the outcome as their gilded overlords did. (They didn’t put it in those exact terms.) Between 1897 – 1937, the Supreme Court struck down nearly 200 different statues, most as violations of “freedom of contract” or other violation of “economic substantive due process.”</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">534</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lochner Era &#038; &#8220;Substantive Due Process&#8221; (Part One)</title>
		<link>https://bluecerealeducation.com/blog/lochner-era-substantive-due-process-part-one/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blue Cereal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 21:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allgeyer v. Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP US Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP USGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APUSH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H2H]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lochner Era]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lochner v. New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meyer v. Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierce v. Society of Sisters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/bluecerealwp/blog/lochner-era-substantive-due-process-part-one/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<h3><strong><img src="/sites/default/files/LochnerBakery.jpg" alt="City Bakeries" title="City Bakeries " style="float: left; margin: 1px;" width="150" height="112"></strong></h3><p>The Lochner Era (1897 – 1937), however, is named for a case representing a judicial philosophy which dominated the nation’s highest court for nearly forty years. For over a generation, the Court pushed back against the reform efforts of the Progressive Era and gave FDR fits by overturning many of his best efforts to regulate industry during the Great Depression. They laid the foundation for the modern “school choice” movement by uncovering new rights related to parenting and families. In the process, they brought to life an understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment that would end up securing the rights of American citizens to contraception, gay sex, and abortions.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">533</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
